Benchmarking Full-Length ITS Metabarcoding Across Illumina 2 × 500, PacBio, and Oxford Nanopore Sequencing Using Mock and Soil Communities.

Metabarcoding is a powerful tool for biodiversity comparisons, where standard-size DNA barcodes (> 500 bases) offer better taxonomic resolution than shorter ones. Still, the choice of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines may strongly affect inferred diversity due to various technical biases. We assessed the relative performance of Illumina MiSeq i100 (2 × 500 paired-end), PacBio Revio and Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing and bioinformatics pipelines, using full-length ITS amplicon sequencing datasets from a 103-species mock community and 45 composite soil samples. Despite numerous low-quality reads, PacBio yielded the lowest overall error rate and highest number of taxa. Illumina revealed the highest proportion of chimeric and index-switched reads, along with a strong bias towards shorter amplicons. MinION data analysed using PRONAME and Minovar-a bioinformatics pipeline presented here-had the largest proportion of low-quality data, and rare taxa were lost during data filtering and read polishing steps. Although Minovar enabled amplicon sequence variant (ASV) level precision for common taxa, we recommend clustering ASVs into OTUs. For PacBio, standard filtering approaches outperformed the ASV approach because they retained rare taxa. For Illumina, a stringent ASV approach or removal of rare OTUs would limit artefacts. Across all platforms, excess PCR cycles promoted chimeric and low-quality reads and lost quantitativity in biodiversity assessments. With moderate differences in effect sizes, all analytical approaches supported the conclusion that sampling design determines how we see soil biodiversity responses to land use. For biodiversity surveys based on the full-length ITS metabarcoding, we recommend using PacBio sequencing with standard, non-ASV pipelines.