Hideki Muramatsu
Purpose This paper aims to propose a conceptual framework of “mutual recovery” that reconceptualizes recovery as a relational and reciprocal process involving not only service users but also mental health practitioners (MHPs) and families. Design/methodology/approach This viewpoint paper integrates an expert-by-experience perspective with literature on personal recovery, relational recovery, co-production and the helper therapy principle. It also incorporates reflective observations from self-help group facilitation and Recovery College settings. These reflections are used as a source of conceptual development rather than empirical generalization. Findings The paper identifies a gap in the recovery literature, which primarily focuses on service users while positioning practitioners as providers of care rather than participants in a shared recovery process. It proposes “mutual recovery” as a relational framework characterized by shared reflection, reciprocal role shifts and co-constructed meaning-making, through which all participants may experience personal growth through interaction. Research limitations/implications As a conceptual viewpoint, this paper does not include empirical validation. Future research should operationalize and empirically examine mutual recovery across diverse mental health contexts. Practical implications The framework may inform recovery-oriented practice by supporting reflective spaces, collaborative learning environments and organizational approaches that recognize the development of both service users and practitioners. Social implications By emphasizing shared human experience and relational dynamics, mutual recovery may contribute to reducing stigma and fostering more egalitarian mental health systems. Originality/value This paper offers a novel conceptual integration that positions MHPs as coparticipants in recovery processes, extends existing relational frameworks and more clearly articulates mutual recovery as a distinct and coherent concept.