科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Physical review. D/Physical review. D.2025-11-12· Waveform

Systematic bias in LISA ringdown analysis due to waveform inaccuracy

Lodovico Capuano, Massimo Vaglio, Rohit S. Chandramouli, Chantal Pitte, Adrien Kuntz, Enrico Barausse

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Inaccurate modeling of gravitational-wave signals can introduce systematic biases in the inferred source parameters. As detector sensitivities improve and signals become louder, mitigating such waveform-induced systematics becomes increasingly important. In this work, we assess the systematic biases introduced by an incomplete description of the ringdown signal from massive black hole binaries in the LISA band. Specifically, we investigate the impact of mode truncation in the ringdown template. Using a reference waveform composed of 13 modes, we establish a mode hierarchy and determine the minimum number of modes required to avoid parameter biases across a wide range of LISA sources. For typical systems with masses $\ensuremath{\sim}{10}^{6}--{10}^{7}{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ at redshifts $z\ensuremath{\sim}2--6$, we find that at least 3--6 modes are needed for accurate parameter estimation, while high signal-to-noise ratio events may need at least 10 modes. Our results are a window-insensitive lower bound on the minimum number of modes, as more modes may be needed depending on the choice of time-domain windowing of the postmerger signal.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Systematic bias in LISA ringdown analysis due to waveform inaccuracy — 科研速览 Science Skim