科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Physical review. D/Physical review. D.2025-11-10· Physics

Bayesian analysis of the neutron star equation of state and model comparison: Insights from PSR <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0437</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4715</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , PSR <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0614</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3329</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and other multiphysics data

Sk Md Adil Imam, N. K. Patra

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
We perform a comprehensive Bayesian analysis to constrain the neutron star (NS) equation of state (EoS) using a wide range of terrestrial and astrophysical data. The terrestrial inputs include quantities related to symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) and symmetry energy up to two times saturation density (${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{0}\ensuremath{\simeq}0.16\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{fm}}^{\ensuremath{-}3}$), derived from finite nuclei and heavy ion collisions (HIC). The astrophysical constraints incorporate NS radii and tidal deformabilities from recent Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) observations and GW170817, respectively. We consider five different EoS models: Taylor, $n/3$, Skyrme, relative mean field, and sound speed (CS), and analyze them by sequentially updating the priors with (i) chiral effective field theory ($\ensuremath{\chi}\mathrm{EFT}$)-based pure neutron matter, (ii) terrestrial, empirical, and earlier astrophysical data, (iii) case (ii) including NICER radii of PSR $\mathrm{J}0437+4715$ and $\mathrm{J}0614+3329$, (iv) all data combined, and (v) excluding empirical nuclear inputs. We also perform Bayesian model comparison, which favors the Skyrme model under all combined data [scenario (iv)], yielding tight constraints on symmetry energy parameters: ${L}_{0}=56\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}3\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ and ${K}_{\mathrm{sym}0}=\ensuremath{-}132\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}15\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$, and also on SNM parameters: ${K}_{0}=265\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}12\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$ and ${Q}_{0}=\ensuremath{-}366\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}43\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}$. The mass-radius and mass--tidal deformability posterior distributions are also well constrained. The radius and tidal deformability of a $1.4{M}_{\ensuremath{\bigodot}}$ neutron star are found to be ${R}_{1.4}=11.85\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.11\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{km}$ and ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}}_{1.4}=354\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}25$, respectively.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Bayesian analysis of the neutron star equation of state and model comparison: Insights from PSR <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0437</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4715</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , PSR <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">J</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0614</mml:mn> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3329</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , and other multiphysics data — 科研速览 Science Skim