Y. Zhu, A. B. Ikuzwe Sindikubwabo, Y. Bradford, L. Caruth, R. Salowe, K. Pham, L. Moksha, V. Vrathasha, R. Lee, M. Halimitabrizi, I. D. Rosa, L. Ghaffari, J. He, M. D. Ritchie, J. O'Brien, S. S. Verma
We evaluated four polygenic risk scores (PGS), two genome-wide and two curated, weighted by African ancestry effect sizes.
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) disproportionately affects individuals of African ancestry, for whom risk prediction tools remain limited. We evaluated four polygenic risk scores (PGS), two genome-wide and two curated, weighted by African ancestry effect sizes. Used alone, the scores showed modest discrimination. Age and sex were strongly predictive; adding PGS616 reached a cross-validated AUC of 0.713 in the training cohort (N = 271), comparable to the demographic model. In the Penn Medicine BioBank (N = 9,084) the model reached AUC = 0.727, similar to 0.729 for age and sex alone, with comparable case detection at fixed specificity. In a suspect cohort (N = 1,013), predicted risk tracked cup-to-disc ratio and nerve fiber layer thinning, an association explained by age and sex. These results establish a demographic benchmark for evaluating ancestry-matched PGS in POAG.