P. Thirusangu, L. Jin, S. Rao, U. Ray, A. Zhao, J. Staub, X. Wu, X. Hou, J. L. VanBlaricom, S. M. M. Aalam, S.-H. Lee, A. L. Oberg, N. Kannan, J. Weroha, J. Chien, S. H. Kaufmann, J. N. Bakkum-Gamez, V. Shridhar
ABSTRACT Background: Despite treatment advances, ovarian cancer (OC) remains the deadliest gynecological cancer, with a ~70% mortality rate. OCs initially respond to platinum chemotherapy but often develop resistance. While PARP inhibitors improve relapse-free survival in responsive cases, they do not extend overall survival. This underscores the need for effective combination therapies beyond BRCA status. The lysosomal protein cathepsin L (CTSL) can traffic to the nucleus, where it can regulate DNA repair and serve as a chromatin modifier. Here, we tested the hypothesis that nucleoside analog clofarabine (CLF) induced nuclear CTSL (nCTSL) serves as a biomarker of sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in ovarian cancer. Methods: Role of nuclear CTSL in DNA damage, synergy with PARPis and CRM1 inhibitor, tumor regression was analyzed by 3D-spheroid culture, colony forming assay, subcellular fractions, comet assay, and IFC/ western-blotting using PARP inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant OC cell lines, ex vivo cultures of patient-derived OC ascites cells (OVA), primary OCs, and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Results: In OC cell lines, treatment with CLF induced nCTSL in a subset of models-designated CLF-responsive (CLF-r)-and sensitized them to the PARP inhibitors olaparib and rucaparib. In CLF-non-responsive (CLF-nr) models, nCTSL trafficking and drug synergy were achieved with the CLF+olaparib combination. Synergy was observed in 47% of CLF-r and 24% of CLF-nr OVA samples. Mechanistically, CLF monotherapy induced nuclear import of CTSL via KPNB1 in CLF-r cells, while combination treatment with CLF+olaparib was required in CLF-nr cells. CLF also downregulated the nuclear export protein CRM1 in both CLF-r and CLF-nr models. CTSL knockdown conferred resistance to CLF+olaparib in both cohorts, supporting a functional role for nCTSL in therapeutic response. Notably, in a subset of OVAs (29%) classified as CLF-resistant (CLF-Res), CLF failed to downregulate CRM1; however, pharmacological inhibition of CRM1 with KPT8602 restored sensitivity to CLF+PARP inhibitor treatment. In vivo, CLF+olaparib treatment in CLF-r and CLF-nr PDX models led to enhanced DNA damage, reduced tumor burden, and prolonged survival. Conclusion: Collectively, these findings identify nCTSL as a predictive marker of response to DNA-damaging therapies and support the CLF+olaparib combination as a promising strategy for overcoming drug resistance in OC via CTSL-mediated DNA damage.