科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Annals of surgery2026-08-06

Development and Reliability of a Competency Assessment Tool for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation of the Esophagus (MSA CAT) as Part of a Video-based Surgical Quality Assurance Program for the GOLF Trial.

Nainika Menon, Paul Goldsmith, Richard Owen, Heidi Paine, Maria Bencivenga, Luigi Bonavina, James Gossage, Christian A Gutschow, Sumeet Mittal, Jessica M Leers, John Lipham, Sebastian F Schoppmann, Ahmed Ahmed, Shahin Ayazi, Natalie S Blencowe, Sheraz R Markar

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Operative steps and key errors were drafted based on the literature. During the 3-round virtual Delphi Consensus amendments to each version were undertaken. Finally, an operative manual and CAT were developed with mandatory, optional, and prohibited steps and quality scores ranging from 1 to 4. The MSA CAT demonstrated good inter- and intra-assessor reliability, particularly when categorizing pairs of scores into "concerning" versus "acceptable." For interassessor reliability, the mean Cohen's kappa was 0.785 (0.582-0.892) and 0.827 (0.591-0.912) for each video. For intra-assessor reliability, it was 0.745 (0.717-0.773) and 0.740 (0.510-1.00) for each video.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: The development and reliability testing of a video-based competency assessment tool for magnetic sphincter augmentation of the esophagus (MSA CAT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical quality assurance (SQA) is the assessment of intraoperative performance by measuring adherence to standardized steps, occurrence of technical errors, and overall technical proficiency. SQA is part of the GOLF trial (ISRCTN: 1353317), an international, multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing 2 antireflux procedures, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and fundoplication. GOLF is the first RCT in which a video-based SQA program was developed with a plan for validation and implementation. METHODS: Ten international experts in antireflux surgery participated in a 3-round virtual Delphi consensus process to develop the MSA CAT. To establish interassessor reliability, 6 surgeons reviewed 2 MSA videos. After 3 months, they reviewed the same MSA videos to test intra-assessor reliability using Cohen's kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Operative steps and key errors were drafted based on the literature. During the 3-round virtual Delphi Consensus amendments to each version were undertaken. Finally, an operative manual and CAT were developed with mandatory, optional, and prohibited steps and quality scores ranging from 1 to 4. The MSA CAT demonstrated good inter- and intra-assessor reliability, particularly when categorizing pairs of scores into "concerning" versus "acceptable." For interassessor reliability, the mean Cohen's kappa was 0.785 (0.582-0.892) and 0.827 (0.591-0.912) for each video. For intra-assessor reliability, it was 0.745 (0.717-0.773) and 0.740 (0.510-1.00) for each video. DISCUSSION: This work describes the development and reliability of the novel MSA CAT. This will be further validated by prospective and retrospective video analysis.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Development and Reliability of a Competency Assessment Tool for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation of the Esophagus (MSA CAT) as Part of a Video-based Surgical Quality Assurance Program for the GOLF Trial. — 科研速览 Science Skim