Comparative Analysis of Presurgical Lip, Alveolus, and Nose Approximation and Nasoalveolar Molding in Infants With Bilateral Cleft Lip.

Presurgical lip, alveolus, and nose approximation (PLANA) is a form of presurgical infant orthopedics designed to reduce cleft severity without an intraoral molding plate. This study compared nasolabial outcomes and the burden of care in patients with a bilateral cleft treated with PLANA in relation to nasoalveolar molding (NAM). A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of all patients with bilateral cleft lip treated with NAM (2016-2019) or PLANA (2023-2025). Clinical data were collected, including treatment timing, number of visits, and number of unscheduled appointments. Anthropometric measurements for nasolabial angle (NLA), columella length, pronasale to subnasale distance, and alar base width at initiation and completion of therapy were collected. Paired-samples t tests were used for intragroup changes, and independent-samples t tests were used for intergroup comparisons. Across 24 patients (11 PLANA and 13 NAM), the PLANA cohort required fewer visits (6 versus 17, P<0.05) and unscheduled appointments (0 versus 1, P=0.01). Treatment initiation occurred earlier in the PLANA group (11 versus 35 d, P<0.05), as did the insertion of the nasal appliance or stent (19 versus 72 d, P<0.05). Primary surgery was performed earlier in the PLANA group (107 versus 150 d, P<0.05). Both groups exhibited improvements in NLA, columella length, and the pronasale-to-subnasale difference, with no intergroup differences. The PLANA group exhibited greater improvement in alar base width (3.3 versus 0.4 mm, P=0.01). Patients treated with PLANA exhibit favorable nasolabial outcomes, as well as reduced treatment durations, scheduled visits, unscheduled appointments, and overall burden of care.