科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Sexually transmitted diseases2026-09-17

An Evaluation of post-sexual assault care guidelines using the AGREE II toolkit with a focus on prophylactic antibiotic recommendations.

Clare Lewandowski-Fowler-Porter, Jarlath Swail, Abir Mamun, Georgia Horsman, Clare Taverner, Daniel Richardson, Suneeta Soni

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Future guideline development should prioritise editorial independence, developmental rigour, and applicability.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate nationally and internationally published, English-language clinical guidelines on the management of sexual assault, with a specific focus on the recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis for sexually transmitted infections, using the AGREE II toolkit and a bespoke assessment framework co-designed with survivors. METHOD: A comprehensive online search (Google, SAFEta, the TRIP database, and UpToDate) for clinical guidelines published in the past five years was performed and reported using the PRISMA guidelines. Four reviewers independently appraised each guideline using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE II) tool. An AGREE II domain score of >60% is the threshold for sufficient quality, and each guideline was rated high, average or low based on the domain percentages (five domains scoring >60%=high, 3-4 domains scoring >60%=average and ≤2 domains scoring>60%=low). A bespoke evaluation tool, developed with survivors, was applied to assess inclusive language, clarity of antimicrobial prophylaxis criteria, adherence considerations, antimicrobial stewardship, psychological impact, and follow-up guidance. RESULTS: Sixteen guidelines met inclusion criteria from the WHO, UK, USA, Ireland and Australia. The median overall AGREE II score was 65% (IQR 42-79). The overall AGREE II score was 69% (IQR 45-81) (domain 1 (scope and purpose) 89% (IQR=80-92), domain 2 (stakeholder involvement) 75% (IQR=68-76), domain 3 (rigour of development) 42% (IQR=32-57), domain 4 (clarity of presentation) 80% (IQR=72-85), domain 5 (applicability) 56% (IQR 48=63), domain 6 (editorial independence) 69% (IQR=45-81)). Three guidelines (WHO, BASHH-UK, CDC: USA) had a high overall rating and overall scores of 6. Six guidelines met all bespoke tool criteria: BASHH, CDC, Wales, USA, Scotland, and WHO. CONCLUSION: Future guideline development should prioritise editorial independence, developmental rigour, and applicability.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

An Evaluation of post-sexual assault care guidelines using the AGREE II toolkit with a focus on prophylactic antibiotic recommendations. — 科研速览 Science Skim