科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Indian journal of surgical oncology2026-08-01

Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) and Radioactive Seed Localization (RSL) versus Wire-guided Localization (WGL) in Breast-conserving Surgery for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Victor Arthur Ohannesian, Bruno Marçola Ishizuka, Isabelle Rodrigues Menezes, Paweł Łajczak, Matheus Almeida Cabral, Henrique Busch Vaqueiro, Lucas da Silva Costa, Pedro Henrique Machado Carani, Yasmin Picanco Silva, Miguel José Francisco Neto, Akemi Osawa, Jairo Wagner, Solange Amorim Nogueira

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
UNLABELLED: Non-palpable breast cancers require precise localization techniques for surgical excision. Wire-guided localization (WGL) has been the standard, but newer methods like Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) and Radioactive Seed Localization (RSL) offer potential benefits. This study compares the efficacy and safety of these techniques in breast-conserving surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared ROLL, RSL, and WGL in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. Primary outcomes included surgical margin status, re-excision rates, and operative time. Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction and adverse events. From 8,300 articles, 2,081 were screened, and 15 RCTs were included. Seven studies compared WGL vs. ROLL (1,441 patients), and eight compared WGL vs. RSL (2,376 patients). RSL associated with a modest reduction compared with WGL for positive surgical margins (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.98, I2 = 42%) and reoperations (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.95, I2 = 0%), both statistically significant. ROLL showed a modest advantage over WGL (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.45-0.96, I2 = 0%). Other comparisons, including complications related to marker implantation and sentinel lymph node identification failures, showed no significant differences. Across analyses, effect sizes were small, and heterogeneity among included studies was moderate. RSL and ROLL appear to offer modest advantages over WGL for localizing non-palpable breast cancers in breast-conserving surgery. Both techniques demonstrated favorable outcomes in margin clearance and re-excision rates, though overall differences remain limited. Further research directly comparing ROLL and RSL is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-025-02481-8.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Radioguided Occult Lesion Localization (ROLL) and Radioactive Seed Localization (RSL) versus Wire-guided Localization (WGL) in Breast-conserving Surgery for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. — 科研速览 Science Skim