科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026-08-01

External validation of the Intermountain Risk Scores for postdischarge thrombosis and bleeding in an independent population.

Mansour Gergi, Katherine S Wilkinson, Nicholas Roetker, Karlyn Martin, Allen B Repp, Neil A Zakai

一句话结论 · In one sentence

The IMRSs demonstrated limited discrimination in this external cohort. These findings suggest that the IMRSs may not be generalizable to all medical populations and highlight the need for more robust risk-stratification tools.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Extended thromboprophylaxis after medical hospitalization has not consistently shown benefit, largely due to increased bleeding events. Accurate prediction of postdischarge (PD) venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding risk is therefore essential. The Intermountain Risk Scores (IMRSs) were developed to predict 90-day risks of these outcomes following discharge. OBJECTIVES: To assess the predictive performance and external validity of the IMRSs in an independent cohort. METHODS: We retrospectively identified adults discharged alive from medical hospitalizations at an academic medical center between 2010 and 2019. PD VTE and bleeding events were identified using validated computable phenotypes. IMRSs were calculated using data at discharge, with missing data addressed via multiple imputation. We determined the observed risks of VTE and bleeding in our cohort for low- and high-risk patients and compared these with the corresponding risks reported in the original cohort and evaluated model discrimination by estimating the time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: Among 14,556 discharges, 108 PD VTE and 373 PD bleeding events occurred within 90 days. The observed risk for high-risk and low-risk categories was 0.9% and 0.5% for VTE (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% CI, 0.88-2.59) and 4.2% and 1.8% for bleeding (hazard ratio 2.51; 95% CI, 2.04-3.08), respectively. Discrimination was poor for both outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.55 for VTE; 0.60 for bleeding). CONCLUSION: The IMRSs demonstrated limited discrimination in this external cohort. These findings suggest that the IMRSs may not be generalizable to all medical populations and highlight the need for more robust risk-stratification tools.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

External validation of the Intermountain Risk Scores for postdischarge thrombosis and bleeding in an independent population. — 科研速览 Science Skim