Ahmed Sulieman, Maxwell Sahhar, Yesha H Parekh, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Breton G Line, Christopher P Ames, Shay Bess, Thomas J Buell, Robert K Eastlack, Jeffrey L Gum, Munish C Gupta, Richard A Hostin, Han Jo Kim, Darryl Lau, Gregory M Mundis, Peter G Passias, Themistocles S Protopsaltis, Christopher I Shaffrey, Justin S Smith, Khaled M Kebaish, Sang Hun Lee, International Spine Study Group
Stopping fusion at T1 or T2 did not result in greater complication or reoperation rates than extending to the cervical spine. The instrumentation-related complication rate was higher for extension to the LC than to the UC or UT spine. Crossing the CTJ should be individualized, but may not prevent additional proximal junctional-level problems in the management of thoracolumbar fusion PJK.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of multicenter, prospective cervical deformity database.
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of extension of fusion to the cervical spine versus the upper thoracic (UT) spine.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) management after thoracolumbar fusion requires extension of fusion to the proximal spinal segments. Unlike extensions to the less mobile thoracic segments, crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) involves more mobile cervical segments and creates different biomechanical influences and clinical outcomes. No study has compared the outcomes of extending fusion to the cervical versus the UT spine.
METHODS: Patients with thoracic PJK who underwent revision with extension of fusion to either the cervical or UT (T1 or T2) spine were identified in a multicenter, prospective cervical deformity database. Patients with cervical upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) were subdivided into lower cervical (LC; C4-7) and upper cervical (UC; and occiput-C3) groups. Baseline demographics, surgical variables, radiographic outcomes, 2-year health-related quality-of-life scores, complications, and revision rates were analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (mean age: 60.4±12.9 y; 91% female) with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Twelve had extension to the UT, 20 to the LC, and 19 to the UC spine. Demographic data, Charlson Comorbidity Index, follow-up duration, surgical parameters, radiographic measurements, recurrent PJK and reoperation rates, and 2-year patient-reported outcome scores were similar across groups. The instrumentation failure rate was higher in the LC (25%) than in the UT (0%) and UC (8%) groups (P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Stopping fusion at T1 or T2 did not result in greater complication or reoperation rates than extending to the cervical spine. The instrumentation-related complication rate was higher for extension to the LC than to the UC or UT spine. Crossing the CTJ should be individualized, but may not prevent additional proximal junctional-level problems in the management of thoracolumbar fusion PJK.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.