Gregory S Kazarian, Jung K Mok, Mihir Dekhne, Stephane Owusu-Sarpong, Takashi Hirase, Kyle W Morse, Vishaal Nayagam, Tony Lewis, Nicholas Giattino, James Farmer, Russel Huang, Han Jo Kim, Sravisht Iyer, James Dowdell, Todd Albert, Sheeraz Qureshi
Heterotopic ossification (HO) following CDR is strongly associated with inadequate endplate coverage. A direction-specific relationship exists whereby undercoverage location predicts HO location. Maintaining ID>85% and EER <15% may help limit severe HO risk.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic analysis of patients undergoing cervical disc replacement (CDR).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of anteroposterior endplate coverage on the development, location, and severity of heterotopic ossification (HO) following CDR, and to establish clinically actionable coverage thresholds.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a common complication following CDR that may limit the range of motion. While endplate coverage has been implicated as a risk factor, the direction-specific relationship between undercoverage location and HO location, as well as dose-response thresholds, remains poorly defined.
METHODS: Patients undergoing CDR (2015-2024) with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up were retrospectively assessed (221 levels). Implant-to-endplate depth ratio (ID: ED) and exposed endplate ratio (EER) were measured on the first postoperative radiographs. HO was graded on final radiographs using the McAfee classification (0-4). Dose-response, direction-matched correlations, and ROC analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Heterotopic ossification (HO) was present in 85.8% of levels, with 42.7% developing severe HO (grade 3-4). Posterior HO was more common than anterior (84.3% vs. 41.3%, P<0.001). ID: ED correlated inversely with HO grade at both endplates (P<0.001). Dose-response analysis demonstrated that severe HO rates increased from 22.2% (Q1) to 57.9% (Q4; RR=2.61, P<0.0001). Direction-matched analysis confirmed anterior undercoverage predicted anterior HO (r=0.422, P<0.0001) and posterior undercoverage predicted posterior HO (r=0.300, P<0.0001). ROC analysis identified an ID: ED ≤0.850 as the optimal threshold (AUC=0.668, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Heterotopic ossification (HO) following CDR is strongly associated with inadequate endplate coverage. A direction-specific relationship exists whereby undercoverage location predicts HO location. Maintaining ID>85% and EER <15% may help limit severe HO risk.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prognostic study.