科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology2026-01-01

Same sample, different result: Variation in clozapine assay measurement in four UK laboratories.

Matthew Atkins, James Fritz, Mary Rose Hilaire, David Taylor

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Laboratory assays of clozapine using LC-MS and HPLC are not always accurate or reproducible over time. Some laboratories show a significant bias, reporting measured concentrations much higher than the true value.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Laboratory measurement of clozapine blood concentrations is central to safe and effective treatment and is commonly assumed to be accurate and reproducible across providers. Chromatographic assays require batch-specific setup and are performed using different equipment and techniques, which may introduce error or variability. However, systematic evaluation of inter-provider consistency is limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the analytical accuracy and reproducibility of clozapine and norclozapine blood concentration measurements across four UK laboratories providing routine therapeutic drug monitoring. DESIGN: Laboratory-based analytical accuracy and repeatability study. METHOD: A panel of 15 spiked plasma samples covering a clinically relevant concentration range for clozapine and norclozapine (74-1443 ng/mL) was distributed to four UK laboratories providing routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Each laboratory analysed the same samples on two separate occasions. Analytical accuracy relative to known values and intra-laboratory consistency were assessed using regression and agreement analyses. RESULTS: All laboratories demonstrated strong linearity between measured and known concentrations (r = 0.932-0.999). Laboratories A and C showed slopes close to unity (0.94-0.99), minimal mean bias (-28 to +22 ng/mL), and narrow limits of agreement for clozapine (-89 to +51 ng/mL) and norclozapine (-71 to +71 ng/mL) across both rounds. In contrast, laboratories B and D showed reduced agreement on repeat testing, with increased slopes, positive bias, and widened limits of agreement in the second round. For laboratory B, the clozapine slope increased from 0.99 to 1.33, with limits of agreement widening to -320 to +673 ng/mL. Laboratory D showed greater deviation, with the clozapine slope increasing from 1.18 to 1.59 and mean bias rising to +349 ng/mL, with very wide limits of agreement (-354 to +1053 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: Laboratory assays of clozapine using LC-MS and HPLC are not always accurate or reproducible over time. Some laboratories show a significant bias, reporting measured concentrations much higher than the true value.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Same sample, different result: Variation in clozapine assay measurement in four UK laboratories. — 科研速览 Science Skim