Tariq Azamgarhi, Herbert Gbejuade, Ryan A Hamilton, Simon Warren, Elizabeth S R Darley, Mark Gilchrist, Erden Ali, Félix-Antoine Garneau-Picard, Jason C J Webb
Antimicrobial-loaded PMMA bone cement has been used since the 1970s as both a fixation material and a local antimicrobial reservoir. Its clinical roles differ between prophylaxis in primary arthroplasty and treatment of established infection, particularly during revision surgery and through the use of temporary spacers. Commercially manufactured products offer more predictable handling, but bespoke admixing may be considered when resistant or unusual organisms are encountered. This Viewpoint argues that such practice requires clearer governance. Cement formulation, antimicrobial choice, dose and mixing technique influence elution, bioactivity, mechanical strength and toxicity. Local delivery may support antimicrobial stewardship, but prolonged low-level elution could theoretically select for resistance if poorly planned. We propose a cautious, evidence-informed framework to support multidisciplinary decision-making and the development of PMMA-specific antimicrobial guidance.