科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ The Journal of infectious diseases2026-09-26

Expert Consensus on Controlled Human Infection Studies for Gonorrhoea.

Susanne H Hodgson, James S McCarthy, Joseph A Duncan, Eloise Williams, Stephanie McLaughlin, Cristina Alaimo, Peter Davis, Isabel Delany, Alexander D Douglas, Scott D Gray-Owen, Andrew Gorringe, Odile B Harrison, E Jamrozik, Calman MacLennan, Richard Moxon, Seamus O'Brien, Mariagrazia Pizza, Georgina L Pollock, Sanjay Ram, Kate L Seib, Samantha Vanderslott, Iason Vichos, Deborah A Williamson, Kamil Wolanin, Paul Zimmer-Harwood, Eric P F Chow

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Gonorrhoea CHIS are an underutilised but valuable research tool with potential to accelerate translational research against gonorrhoea. With robust ethical oversight, community engagement and international collaboration, expanded and harmonised CHIS could substantially advance prevention and treatment strategies.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Gonorrhoea, a bacterial sexually transmitted infection caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae, is a major global public health concern due to rising incidence and increasing antimicrobial resistance. Absence of a licensed vaccine and limitations of animal models have impeded progress in the understanding of pathogenesis, immunity and development of novel therapeutics and vaccines. Controlled human infection studies (CHIS) offer a powerful approach to accelerate vaccine and antimicrobial development and improve understanding of host-pathogen interactions. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary stakeholder workshop was convened in Oxford, UK (March 2025) to review current gonorrhoea CHIS activity, define research priorities and establish consensus standards for future studies through structured discussion. RESULTS: Consensus highlighted the continued value of CHIS with well-characterised strains such as FA1090, while supporting careful selection and characterisation of novel strains. Standardised, risk-based approaches to inoculum manufacture and quality assurance were recommended to enhance reproducibility and scalability. Expansion of CHIS to include additional anatomical sites and novel populations, including individuals with female reproductive anatomy, was identified as scientifically valuable but requiring careful ethical and safety evaluation. CHIS were recognised as uniquely positioned to advance vaccine and antimicrobial development by enabling early efficacy assessment, identification of correlates of protection and optimisation of treatment and prevention strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Gonorrhoea CHIS are an underutilised but valuable research tool with potential to accelerate translational research against gonorrhoea. With robust ethical oversight, community engagement and international collaboration, expanded and harmonised CHIS could substantially advance prevention and treatment strategies.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Expert Consensus on Controlled Human Infection Studies for Gonorrhoea. — 科研速览 Science Skim