科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026-08-04

Population reach and participation rate in opportunistic vs. systematic atrial fibrillation screening: STROKESTOP III.

Mashroor Khan, Sofia Skröder, Michael Ingre, Fredrik Carlstedt, Anders Eriksson, Johanna Star Tenn, Mårten Rosenqvist, Emma Svennberg

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Opportunistic screening increased participation among invited individuals and identified a higher-risk population, but its overall population reach was limited by incomplete eligibility assessment. Combining opportunistic and systematic strategies may optimize reach and participation in AF screening programmes.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
AIMS: Population-based screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) should be considered in elderly individuals to enable AF detection. However, participation in systematic screening programmes is often suboptimal. STROKESTOP III evaluated whether opportunistic screening could improve participation compared with systematic screening. METHODS AND RESULTS: STROKESTOP III is a cluster-randomized trial including individuals aged 75-76 years from 16 primary care centres in Region Värmland, Sweden. Centres were randomized to systematic screening, using mailed invitations, or opportunistic screening, using invitations during visits.In the systematic arm, 1312 individuals were eligible and invited, of whom 607 participated (46.3%). In the opportunistic arm, 1390 individuals attended participating primary care centres and were potentially eligible for invitation. However, 641 individuals (46.1%) were not assessed for eligibility. Among the 749 assessed individuals, 609 were eligible and 374 participated.Participation among invited eligible individuals was significantly higher with opportunistic than systematic screening (374/609, 61.4% vs. 607/1,312, 46.3%; P < 0.005). However, overall reach was lower in the opportunistic arm because of incomplete assessment for invitation (374/1,479, 25.3% vs. 607/1,437, 42.2%; P < 0.005). Participants in the opportunistic arm had a higher cardiovascular risk burden, including more hypertension, diabetes, and a higher CHA2DS2-VASc-score (3.99 vs. 3.60; P < 0.005). Exclusion rates were higher (18.7% vs. 8.7%; P < 0.005), mainly due to previously diagnosed AF and cognitive impairment. CONCLUSION: Opportunistic screening increased participation among invited individuals and identified a higher-risk population, but its overall population reach was limited by incomplete eligibility assessment. Combining opportunistic and systematic strategies may optimize reach and participation in AF screening programmes.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Population reach and participation rate in opportunistic vs. systematic atrial fibrillation screening: STROKESTOP III. — 科研速览 Science Skim