Ling Yuan, Chunyu He, Yuanmei Zhao, Yan Xie, Yurou Tian, Zhen Zhuo
In this sample, self-care ability and caregiver contribution were associated with individuals' own psychological resources rather than cross-partner influences. Given the cross-sectional design and the absence of objective functional status measures, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Intervention strategies should address patients and caregivers separately but concurrently, while recognising their distinct roles in self-care processes.
BACKGROUND: Self-care after stroke develops within an interdependent patient-caregiver context. Although patient self-efficacy and caregiver preparedness are recognised as key determinants of post-stroke management, their dyadic associations with self-care-related variables remain insufficiently understood.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 198 patient-caregiver dyads recruited from three tertiary hospitals in China. Patient self-efficacy, caregiver preparedness, patient self-care ability and caregiver contribution were assessed using validated instruments. Dyadic associations were analysed using the actor-partner interdependence model within a distinguishable dyad regression framework. Standardised regression coefficients are reported.
RESULTS: Significant actor effects were identified for both members of the dyad. Patient self-efficacy was negatively associated with patient self-care ability (β= -0.242, p < 0.001), whereas caregiver preparedness was positively associated with caregiver contribution (β = 0.289, p < 0.001). No significant partner effects were observed. Patient self-efficacy and caregiver preparedness were positively correlated (r = 0.210, p < 0.01). The model explained 19.4% of the variance in patient self-care ability and 29.3% in caregiver contribution.
CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, self-care ability and caregiver contribution were associated with individuals' own psychological resources rather than cross-partner influences. Given the cross-sectional design and the absence of objective functional status measures, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Intervention strategies should address patients and caregivers separately but concurrently, while recognising their distinct roles in self-care processes.