Yusuke Inaba, Hidehito Endo, Yu Takahashi, Sachito Minegishi, Teppei Shimasaki, Daisuke Kurai, Harumasa Nakazawa, Norihiko Ohura, Hirohisa Takeuchi, Nobutsugu Abe, Hiroshi Kubota
Xenopericardial roll graft replacement was technically feasible as part of a multidisciplinary staged strategy in selected patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal native aortic or prosthetic graft infection. However, fungal reinfection and xenopericardial roll graft-related structural complications remain important concerns, and careful long-term surveillance is required.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term outcomes of in situ aortic reconstruction using xenopericardial roll grafts for thoracic and thoracoabdominal native aortic and prosthetic graft infection.
METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study included consecutive patients who underwent xenopericardial roll graft replacement, including branched graft reconstruction and/or tissue filling, between 2010 and 2024. A multidisciplinary treatment strategy was adopted.
RESULTS: This study included 21 patients who underwent 22 procedures (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 63.75-73.75). On a procedure basis, the indications were infectious aortic aneurysm in 4 procedures and prosthetic graft infection in 18 procedures. Replacement sites included the ascending aorta (n = 4), aortic arch (n = 11), descending aorta (n = 6), and thoracoabdominal aorta (n = 1). Tissue filling was performed in 12 procedures. The 30-day and operative mortality rates were 13.6% (3/22) and 18.2% (4/22), respectively. After excluding the three procedures with 30-day mortality, 19 procedures were included in the Kaplan-Meier analyses. Aorta-related mortality occurred in 10.5% (2/19), both due to fungal reinfection. The median follow-up was 53.6 months (IQR, 20-80.5; maximum, 132 months). The estimated survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 94%±6%, 76%±11%, 70%±11%, and 56%±15%, respectively. Xenopericardial roll graft-related structural complications included suture-line pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), suture-line rupture (n = 1), branch kinking (n = 1), xenopericardial roll graft body pseudoaneurysm (n = 1), and proximal anastomotic pseudoaneurysm (n = 1). No thromboembolism or graft calcification was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Xenopericardial roll graft replacement was technically feasible as part of a multidisciplinary staged strategy in selected patients with thoracic and thoracoabdominal native aortic or prosthetic graft infection. However, fungal reinfection and xenopericardial roll graft-related structural complications remain important concerns, and careful long-term surveillance is required.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable. This study is a retrospective observational study.