科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Clinical and experimental dermatology2026-09-05

Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP): a systematic review of scabies clinical practice guidelines.

Cherry Choudhary, Victoria Cox, Ryan Beazley, Sidra Khan, William Haw, Ali Al Janabi, Samuel Ashcroft, Lynda Atsen, Ichechiek Ujile, Lucy Pollock, Claire Fuller, Zenas Z N Yiu

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Most CPGs published on scabies globally within the last 15 years had low methodological quality, with consistent lack of stakeholder involvement and were almost exclusively published in high SDI or upper-middle SDI countries. Expansion of research should be encouraged and supported in resource-limited settings which are currently underrepresented despite experiencing a higher burden of disease.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Scabies is a neglected tropical disease endemic in many resource-limited settings worldwide. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess individual clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on scabies for their quality, accessibility, and applicability; with special attention to health equity implications. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken to identify CPGs published on scabies, covering publications from 01/01/2010 to 30/08/2025. The search included a manual review of each dermatological society recognised by the International League of Dermatological Societies, guideline depositories and electronic databases. The CPGs which met inclusion criteria were critically appraised using the AGREE II Instrument, Lenzer's red flags and The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's National Guideline Clearinghouse Extent Adherence to Trustworthiness Standards (NEATS) instrument. RESULTS: Fourteen CPGs met the inclusion criteria. There was significant heterogeneity in the focus area of the published guidelines. Each CPG had at least one low-quality domain on critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument, and at least one red flag when applying Lenzer's methodology. Scoring was consistently low regarding 'Stakeholder involvement' on AGREE II and 'Patient and public perspectives' on NEATS and Lenzer's red flags. Only one CPG was published in a low SDI (Sociodemographic Index) country. CONCLUSIONS: Most CPGs published on scabies globally within the last 15 years had low methodological quality, with consistent lack of stakeholder involvement and were almost exclusively published in high SDI or upper-middle SDI countries. Expansion of research should be encouraged and supported in resource-limited settings which are currently underrepresented despite experiencing a higher burden of disease.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP): a systematic review of scabies clinical practice guidelines. — 科研速览 Science Skim