Marcin Barczyński, Klaas Van Den Heede, James C. Lee, Kerstin Lorenz, Radu Mihai, Olov Norlén, Kepal N. Patel, Marco Raffaelli, Rebecca S. Sippel, Tracy Wang, Carmen C. Solórzano
Postoperative hypoparathyroidism remains the most frequent complication following thyroid surgery, with reported incidence rates ranging from 14% to 60%1–7. While the majority of cases are transient and resolve within weeks, a substantial proportion (up to 25%) progress to persistent hypoparathyroidism, defined by sustained reductions in parathyroid hormone (PTH) and serum calcium levels beyond 6–12 months after surgery1,2,4,5. Despite its prevalence and clinical impact, postoperative hypoparathyroidism continues to be variably defined across studies and institutions. Terminology such as ‘postoperative parathyroid failure’, ‘protracted hypoparathyroidism’, and ‘permanent hypoparathyroidism’ has been proposed to reflect the temporal evolution of the condition6,7. However, the lack of standardized definitions and reporting criteria has hindered meaningful comparisons across clinical studies and limited the development of consistent management strategies7. Current approaches to hypoparathyroidism management range from short-term calcium and activated vitamin D supplementation to long-term replacement therapy and monitoring protocols7. These variations underscore the need for a unified framework to guide diagnosis, classification, and treatment. In addition to harmonizing definitions, there is a critical need to identify and standardize core variables that should be reported in surgical research related to hypoparathyroidism. These include biochemical parameters (for example PTH and calcium levels), timing of measurements, patient symptoms, and therapeutic interventions. Consistent reporting of these variables is essential to improve data comparability, facilitate meta-analyses, and guide evidence-based practice. Furthermore, hypoparathyroidism has emerged as a key quality marker in thyroid surgery. Its incidence and severity reflect not only surgical technique and intraoperative decision-making but also perioperative care and long-term follow-up. Establishing robust metrics for hypoparathyroidism, such as rates of transient versus permanent hypoparathyroidism, time to recovery, and need for chronic supplementation, can serve as benchmarks for surgical performance and institutional outcomes. In response to this gap, the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES), the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES), and the International Association of Endocrine Surgeons (IAES) collaborated to develop a consensus statement using a structured Delphi methodology. This initiative aims to standardize the reporting of hypoparathyroidism in clinical research and publications (including definitions, core variables to be reported, and quality markers and metrics of thyroid surgery related to hypoparathyroidism) and provide a globally accepted reference for clinicians and researchers in endocrine surgery. In November 2023, the ESES launched a collaborative initiative aimed at establishing a consensus on how hypoparathyroidism following thyroid surgery should be reported in the scientific literature. As part of this effort, the ESES formally reached out to the leadership of the AAES and the IAES, proposing the formation of a joint taskforce to address this important and timely issue. The proposal was met with unanimous support and all three societies appointed expert representatives in surgical thyroid disease to participate in the working group. Ultimately, the taskforce comprised 11 endocrine surgeons: 5 from the ESES (M.B., K.V.D.H., K.L., R.M., and M.R.), 3 from the AAES (K.N.P., R.S.S., and C.C.S.), and 3 from the IAES (J.C.L., O.N., and T.S.W.). This joint effort reflects a shared commitment across international societies to improve consistency and clarity in scientific reporting on hypoparathyroidism. The working group was convened to conduct a comprehensive and current review of the literature, develop the initial draft, and formulate relevant consensus statements. This process was carried out through a series of web-based meetings, complemented by ongoing electronic correspondence to ensure continuity and collaboration. A formal systematic review was deemed impractical and conceptually limiting for the purposes of this consensus statement. The primary challenge lay in the lack of a universally accepted definition of hypoparathyroidism and ‘surgical core variables’ relevant for prevalence of hypoparathyroidism that should be reported in scientific papers. As a result, it would have led to the exclusion of numerous pertinent studies. Conversely, many publications reference hypoparathyroidism without specifying the criteria applied, further complicating the selection process. To address this, targeted literature searches were conducted by dedicated subgroups of three members assigned to each thematic section. The remaining members of the working group were invited to critically appraise the findings and contribute additional high-quality references where appropriate. In areas where published evidence was lacking, expert opinion served as the basis for several statements. The initial draft and proposed statements were subsequently circulated among all working group members for review and refinement, before initiating the modified Delphi process. The modified Delphi method is a well-established process used to achieve consensus systematically and has recently been applied in several publications on thyroid cancer8,9. To reflect the diversity of clinical practice worldwide, while maintaining high expertise among contributing voters, the working group invited members of the ESES, the AAES, and the IAES, selected independently by each of the societies as experts in the field, to participate in a two-round modified Delphi process. The latter, along with the working group members, formed a panel of 92 panellists (full list in the Acknowledgements section) who voted on a dedicated invite-only electronic interface, powered by SurveyMonkey Inc. (San Mateo, CA, USA), thus providing coded data for analysis. Panellists voted on their level of agreement according to a Likert scale ranging from one (strongly disagree) to nine (strongly agree). The survey also allowed panellists to provide feedback and free-text comments on the statements during the first phase. Panellists with missing answers or with difficulties interpreting the statements were contacted individually through subsequent mailings for clarification. Appropriate revisions of the initial statements were made by the methodology leadership (M.B. and K.V.D.H.) supported by input from all taskforce experts according to the first survey feedback. The statements were considered to meet consensus if there was a mean score of ≥7.0 (agree) and either ≤9 (10%) outlier responses or ≤14 (15%) outlier responses with <7 responses scoring <5 (disagreement). Near-consensus was assigned to statements with a mean of ≥6.50 and ≤18 (20%) negative outliers. Non-consensus was the default if the above conditions were not met. Outliers were defined by any value at least two Likert points away from the mean. Negative outliers refer to outliers where the response was that of disagreement (<5). The quality of evidence for each statement was stratified as high, moderate, low, or expert opinion, depending on the type of publication that data were extracted from. Data stemming from RCTs were considered to represent high-quality evidence, whereas those from non-randomized prospective trials were of moderate quality and data from retrospective analyses or case series were deemed to be of low quality. Where no supportive data were available, the term expert opinion was used. The results of the survey were discussed in dedicated General Assembly during the AAES in on during the ESES in on and by electronic for the IAES in the IAES no in statements that reached a was to the statements as accepted or were limited to or agreement level of of was as the for The consensus statement was by the and has support as a joint consensus statement. A of the statements is in published have of definitions and approaches to hypoparathyroidism after thyroid The definitions of hypoparathyroidism PTH levels or a of In most these be studies that the or of to the of in postoperative PTH within the are to calcium levels and to parathyroid this in how hypoparathyroidism is defined across the and systematic comparisons of these parameters To address the by and the statement from the American Association a of hypoparathyroidism three biochemical hypoparathyroidism, clinical hypoparathyroidism, and parathyroid to as postoperative hypoparathyroidism is defined by or low PTH the of the reference with or without Negative A systematic review and recently studies on the definition and of it that postoperative PTH within and intraoperative PTH for hypoparathyroidism, of and were for at no time within the first (for example versus versus was and any within postoperative was PTH within is considered practice in many endocrine surgery for of at of hypoparathyroidism, timely of calcium vitamin D supplementation, and for at low of hypoparathyroidism. This timing is also used in and quality to outcomes. In serum PTH levels after or high for the need for supplementation to that This supplementation and in where timely are The first postoperative PTH level should be within Negative In of this to be after surgery. is a where biochemical markers PTH and calcium are essential for diagnosis, but severity and not with Postoperative hypoparathyroidism be or it can with a of ranging from and and to and 3 Negative clinical and surgical have been to the of hypoparathyroidism following as surgery is and D to and of transient to parathyroid and surgical disease surgical to the and the to or of the parathyroid to thyroid and parathyroid the of parathyroid or are or to thyroid surgery a to and the or intraoperative and of postoperative with calcium and vitamin D should be in with biochemical hypoparathyroidism within This was to the of and and supported of standardized supplementation should be to and three for after postoperative supplementation with calcium and vitamin D and postoperative and and postoperative and postoperative supplementation in the and the of rates were across supplementation for hypoparathyroidism or in the supplementation was deemed the most and it the by In maintaining serum levels is essential for PTH PTH to its as a for while serum PTH and by the with biochemical hypoparathyroidism within after surgery should have calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D before to the of clinical of Negative calcium levels should also be 11 Negative for calcium and vitamin D supplementation among to To of calcium and thyroid should a structured for In with biochemical hypoparathyroidism low serum calcium levels of of calcium should be as to and to of calcium vitamin D Negative 3 to the transient hypoparathyroidism to cases months following surgery, whereas permanent hypoparathyroidism beyond that time These two are on and literature, supported by research and hypoparathyroidism, by serum PTH and calcium to relevant or of While the criteria for hypoparathyroidism are for on and clinical not reflect the to either or that PTH levels and months after thyroid surgery with in of with permanent hypoparathyroidism at months after surgery and that PTH levels or not after months in of This can be by the that most parathyroid to in several and that of postoperative hypoparathyroidism, with their parathyroid at months in 6–12 months in and months in of not during These data support the for transient from permanent hypoparathyroidism, as a substantial proportion of to of parathyroid and months after surgery. This is consistent with the most definition and by international panel of experts as part of the practice discussed at the as a Society in USA), that a of permanent hypoparathyroidism is months after surgical in the of or on two with or low PTH postoperative hypoparathyroidism is a that within the first months after surgery can to with PTH and serum calcium levels within the reference without calcium vitamin D Negative postoperative hypoparathyroidism is a that continues for months after surgery with low serum calcium levels if not The PTH level can be low, or To the of this there should be at within months after surgery. Negative A of studies on hypoparathyroidism after thyroid surgery in the definitions and criteria for hypoparathyroidism, the lack of consistency in the reporting of key surgical variables as of parathyroid or of by and postoperative PTH and calcium levels), and a unified framework for reporting to across studies and A data of surgical core variables is essential to and hypoparathyroidism, surgical and facilitate research and This with by the Society for Endocrine the Endocrine and the for structured data to improve quality and with to thyroid surgery is a of surgical core variables that and postoperative hypoparathyroidism following thyroid surgery that should be reported in research and The of this is to improve the reporting in publications for comparisons studies and of Negative Postoperative hypoparathyroidism is in to the parathyroid from such as or and during surgery. These are if surgery is by thyroid and to the parathyroid and <5 the or thyroid the a critical in the of hypoparathyroidism. These the of the and the of the parathyroid A by a group of for postoperative that should be by the hypoparathyroidism, vitamin D thyroid and modified of the parathyroid guide but not published studies in this that in a of been a incidence of biochemical and and postoperative PTH with that to identify all the of and to transient However, studies and surgical for systematic to ensure and the lack of that and parathyroid in during the of and permanent hypoparathyroidism. with a score versus 3 or where for parathyroid remaining in rates of hypoparathyroidism. in a of studies and that the of for the parathyroid was high can be considered a for systematic of the parathyroid the of and hypoparathyroidism. This the that systematic by or essential for parathyroid during the need to include of and used as core surgical variables in In the a in the of hypoparathyroidism by providing of parathyroid is a well-established for transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. during with for thyroid is and the in with and clinical that transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism were frequent after versus and versus This of surgical core variables should include the following Negative Negative and of thyroid surgery Negative of parathyroid and intraoperative and used Negative Postoperative findings Negative with calcium vitamin vitamin D Negative Negative of Negative Negative 5 A of with a of surgery has that have a of after versus with a among those who have a versus Surgeons thyroid surgery should be of the of after among these thyroid surgery is a for hypoparathyroidism to and parathyroid In a of thyroid were with a incidence of parathyroid were in A of that and the of transient and permanent patient as part of this of surgical core variables should include the following Negative 3 and Negative Negative serum calcium level 11 Negative vitamin D serum level Negative supplementation with calcium vitamin D Negative of surgery Negative of surgery Negative of Negative disease as part of this of surgical core variables should include and for surgery. Negative To ensure and in thyroid surgery research and clinical the be This the and the of as these complication recovery, and long-term outcomes. The method used to the thyroid should be approaches include the and The of thyroid be as it the of such as hypoparathyroidism. or of and the is with the of hypoparathyroidism to the to the parathyroid of one the and the of hypoparathyroidism is is the for thyroid of thyroid it is but be used for of in the and and is in with for thyroid The versus and versus the of postoperative hypoparathyroidism. A prospective postoperative PTH levels and rates of transient in with permanent were and trials that for thyroid not but transient hypoparathyroidism and is a used intraoperative the parathyroid are or during thyroid surgery. While it aims to parathyroid the of a critical in postoperative as studies and have a the of and the incidence of transient that parathyroid was with a in transient hypoparathyroidism, but no in permanent hypoparathyroidism The most of studies with these The key to long-term is intraoperative and of the parathyroid remaining in intraoperative and of the parathyroid is critical to postoperative hypoparathyroidism. the of parathyroid to in RCTs have that the of parathyroid during In has transient hypoparathyroidism to However, there is no evidence that permanent hypoparathyroidism, are is technique that of parathyroid during and using can the of the parathyroid is a key of postoperative of of parathyroid are to after that PTH levels on were in all who at least one parathyroid during surgery using and for hypoparathyroidism. In that the of the parathyroid and the need for postoperative of calcium and and supplementation with in with at least one parathyroid This technique also of the of permanent In this improve decision-making during where is This is supported by data by that the of transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism rates in and and of thyroid surgery should be as part of this of surgical core variables and should include versus versus versus versus Negative versus versus Negative of Negative of in 11 Negative 3 of to be in Negative 3 of Negative versus no of parathyroid versus Negative versus no of intraoperative parathyroid with Negative of for Negative opinion postoperative data for prevalence of postoperative hypoparathyroidism should include serum PTH levels on the of surgery or on In the case of low serum PTH or of subsequent of or serum calcium are in the postoperative to any need for or guide of hypoparathyroidism. Negative postoperative data should also include of calcium supplementation versus only versus and vitamin D or vitamin D 3 Negative for hypoparathyroidism symptoms, for example and and symptoms, for example and and should be were structured clinical or electronic In timing should be postoperative versus long-term accepted of severity need for marker of reflect or and persistent or These variables are essential not only for prevalence but also for the of disease and of To prevalence of hypoparathyroidism of and how were and versus should be In the need for to the and for hypoparathyroidism should be 5 Negative data for prevalence of permanent hypoparathyroidism should include serum calcium and PTH levels at months after surgery, and if was at within months after surgery with to to low calcium Negative data should be reported with of in Negative 3 PTH levels reflect the of the parathyroid before surgery. with a low PTH level have parathyroid or thyroid disease (for example to postoperative studies that PTH levels with the postoperative PTH a value for transient the to identify and the parathyroid and their are to or parathyroid of practice reflect but is a of in endocrine surgery. data from who through the and these thyroid and The of as with a of at of were on by who were with with complication rates and The also that is a for hypoparathyroidism, to for and thyroid disease of surgical and with these conditions should be on by The results of thyroid surgery are the surgery is by In serum PTH levels versus versus and surgical thyroid versus thyroid along with of practice be parameters of for postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Negative In there has been of or that the and after endocrine made at the of such the and of the data that can be used to a research that is In it is considered that the is to represent the as the the practice of with a of and and such data be meaningful in with the by a research reporting for of in The Association of Endocrine and Surgeons was one of the in this it its initial in the The Endocrine as the of Endocrine and has data on and endocrine The the and data for by across the This is a of cases with several data points to guide surgical The the and as as the and is used to and surgical research have been on data the These and have how for in the has with the of how intraoperative PTH in time can surgery and surgery to how the incidence of can be with monitoring and the high incidence of after that a surgical is with a and after surgery of surgery for and to a of The for and was in and its it has support from the relevant In the was The is supported by the for and the of and The data from who have surgical for of the and This that the of for each type of is such as and primary as as conditions parathyroid and The and of the are high, it a robust for quality and scientific publications on hypoparathyroidism have data from the two the the in by the the with cases to was as a within the of the European As of is as a and the of for The of the is the of in The data to for surgical of surgical the of and outcomes. Data for quality are at the level and on and Data are also used for clinical research and to identify and clinical practice for the endocrine surgical contributing to in endocrine surgery and patient The data on serum PTH levels as low, high, or not of parathyroid of parathyroid of to identify the parathyroid of calcium during as for a hypoparathyroidism or of the of or to of vitamin D on from and postoperative PTH serum levels high, or not data have been published with to the incidence of permanent hypoparathyroidism, but contributing to the can their performance in with and international This and The and surgical clinicians their on The ESES has recently launched initiative to surgical across as in endocrine surgery. To be in the have at least one who has the European of of Endocrine and be ESES This aims to in surgical and clinical In the the first quality in the in the The quality the was at surgical that the American of Surgeons launched a in in it as ongoing quality for the to all in the The has been across the while it was at and after surgical it the that were to be critical to the of endocrine In the also the need for data and for thyroid surgery. As is it only a of thyroid surgery each However, it has been as a Data by the for it to support in reporting the development of this the AAES the need for a quality that the that are to endocrine surgery and the in This aims to improve the value of care to The of quality to improve and This is through data ongoing performance feedback to and on of data and collaborative The is in across the and has quality data on The American of the as the for and practice for of the AAES the need for a to support the and for all Endocrine The was launched in with the that all all endocrine the This the AAES to the progress of ensure that the quality and of is across and case in areas quality in are available, institutional on the of markers and metrics of thyroid surgery related to postoperative hypoparathyroidism should be reported in research and publications to for and quality Negative The of reporting should be through the (for example or (for example that the and after thyroid surgery. However, the to these remains in the majority of Negative the of long-term parathyroid is as it a of and to that are from many studies and research that this be A method to its incidence within a or without for would be would clinicians to the quality of their patient care and facilitate research for parathyroid This who for conditions and to the PTH levels and long-term parathyroid Data were from and a quality and biochemical a of persistent parathyroid with to lack of with PTH levels within of surgery a low of permanent hypoparathyroidism. In of low PTH with a of long-term The that PTH serve as a for permanent hypoparathyroidism, further research is to its and PTH level should be within after or as biochemical marker of postoperative hypoparathyroidism. This management at the time of In PTH level be used as a quality marker for of the prevalence of hypoparathyroidism and also to a high prevalence of permanent postoperative hypoparathyroidism. Negative with PTH serum levels on have a low of permanent hypoparathyroidism and are to need monitoring and no calcium supplementation at Negative PTH serum level within after thyroid surgery the of permanent parathyroid and these of supplementation with calcium and vitamin D and further follow-up. Negative intraoperative and postoperative data are to be reported in as are considered quality metrics of thyroid surgery that for comprehensive of the permanent hypoparathyroidism Negative parameters vitamin D serum level and PTH serum level should be reported and 3 Negative intraoperative of parathyroid with in should be Negative 5 postoperative data of parathyroid by PTH serum level within of the need for to the and for hypoparathyroidism, and of D during and long-term should be Negative transient versus permanent hypoparathyroidism monitoring and biochemical data points (for example PTH and calcium levels), are missing or in quality for vitamin D months a in or retrospective studies where clinical data are However, data not reflect clinical supplementation while with permanent hypoparathyroidism be to or lack of data biochemical or for or while can a of permanent hypoparathyroidism should be and with clinical data to ensure This is but not The of data points and the of in quality to a of transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism after thyroid surgery be to vitamin D or for months after thyroid surgery from a such as or a be a it or the prevalence of permanent hypoparathyroidism Negative These statements the need for and reporting in thyroid surgery to improve patient and meaningful comparisons across institutions. While consensus statements were in on quality markers and metrics the of biochemical structured data and the of prevalence lay the for a unified to and postoperative hypoparathyroidism. a of the a was to the above statement in its during the of the AAES, and ESES and by the of the IAES by electronic the voted in of the consensus statement and voted the consensus statement. This consensus formally by members of the ESES, the AAES, and the IAES, a unified framework for the definition of hypoparathyroidism and reporting of surgical core quality and metrics related to the of hypoparathyroidism. is to guide research and publications on surgical in or comparability, and quality across and studies. The have no to The all panellists who comments and feedback during the Delphi ESES experts and AAES experts and and IAES experts and Panellists with two or three of the societies a their primary Data draft, draft, draft, Data draft, Data draft, draft, draft, draft, Data draft, draft, and Data draft, The no of is at Data can be made to the