科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026-08-12

Ampicillin/ceftriaxone vs. β-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yui Sugimoto, Ryosuke Sasaki, Mayu Tominaga, Ryuka Hirai, Takayuki Mihara, Rina Shimamura, Maiko Yoshikawa, Shintaro Ikegami, Sora Shimada, Ayu Tsubouchi, Yuko Okamoto, Yuki Igarashi, Yuki Enoki, Kazuaki Taguchi, Kazuaki Matsumoto

一句话结论 · In one sentence

A + C therapy was associated with a more favorable safety profile than BL + AG therapy, with no significant differences in efficacy, mortality, or relapse in patients with EFIE. These findings support the use of A + C as an important therapeutic option for patients at increased risk of AG-associated toxicity.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) remains a formidable infection requiring prolonged antimicrobial therapy. Although β-lactam/aminoglycoside (BL + AG) combination therapy has long been regarded as the standard treatment, AG-associated toxicities pose a major clinical dilemma. Recently, dual β-lactam therapy with ampicillin/ceftriaxone (A + C) has become an established treatment option. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of A + C versus BL + AG therapy in patients with EFIE. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical studies comparing A + C versus BL + AG for EFIE were included. Primary outcomes were mortality and relapse rates. Secondary outcomes included overall adverse events, renal adverse events, ototoxicity/vestibular toxicity, skin rash, Clostridioides difficile diarrhea, and regimen changes or discontinuation. Pooled ORs and 95% CIs were estimated utilizing random-effects models. RESULTS: Six studies involving 619 patients with EFIE were included. Cumulative mortality (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.73-1.65) and relapse rates (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.39-3.01) did not differ significantly between A + C and BL + AG. However, A + C was associated with significantly lower incidences of total adverse events (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.08-0.53), renal adverse events (OR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19-0.58), ototoxicity/vestibular toxicity (OR 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.37), and antibiotic regimen change (OR 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10-0.39) or discontinuation (OR 0.17, 95% CI: 0.05-0.56). CONCLUSION: A + C therapy was associated with a more favorable safety profile than BL + AG therapy, with no significant differences in efficacy, mortality, or relapse in patients with EFIE. These findings support the use of A + C as an important therapeutic option for patients at increased risk of AG-associated toxicity.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Ampicillin/ceftriaxone vs. β-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy for Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. — 科研速览 Science Skim