Nathaniel Mengers, Brian Kyle Taylor
Many migratory animals sense Earth's magnetic field and use it
for navigation, alongside stimuli in other modalities. Engineered systems could
benefit from similar approaches, especially where satellite signals are unavailable.
However, it is unknown how animals allocate attention between magnetic and non-
magnetic stimuli. One theory is that attention arises from competition between
stimuli, bottom-up biases towards salient (noticeable) stimuli, and top-down
biases towards goal-relevant stimuli. We develop an attention model based on
biased competition for a simulated agent that navigates between known waypoints
using magnetic, olfactory, and visual cues. We characterize how attentional biases
influence the agent's success rate, speed, and path efficiency during migrations
in a diverse set of abstract magnetic environments, with and without fluid
currents. We also explore how attention biases influence obstacle avoidance. Our
work suggests that biased competition is a plausible framework for multimodal
navigation in magnetoreceptive animals or engineered systems. Bottom-up biases
are crucial to obstacle detection, and support navigation near waypoints. While
top-down biases lead to more active navigation and improve speed, they also
hinder obstacle detection. Because we did not optimize parameters, combining
top-down and bottom-up biases did not lead to both efficient navigation and
obstacle avoidance.