科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Pain management2026-08-07

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the relief of primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Evelin de Oliveira Wulf, Maria Rita Brandão, Mariana Olher Goveia, Juliana Cristina Frare, Humberto de Sousa Fontoura, Márcia Rosângela Buzanello, Gladson Ricardo Flor Bertolini

一句话结论 · In one sentence

This meta-analysis quantifies TENS analgesic effect for primary dysmenorrhea, suggesting pain reduction irrespective of electrode placement. However, very high heterogeneity, moderate-to-high risk of bias, wide parameter variability, small samples, and imprecise subgroup estimates limit certainty. TENS appears safe (no serious adverse events), but underreporting prevents firm conclusions. Standardized protocols and high-quality, low-bias trials are needed. Certainty is likely low per GRADE considerations.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize evidence on TENS efficacy for primary dysmenorrhea, providing quantitative meta-analysis of pain intensity, exploratory subgroup analyses on electrode placement, and systematic RoB 2 assessment, addressing gaps from previous qualitative reviews. METHOD: Systematic search across PubMed, VHL, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, PEDro, and gray literature, without restrictions. RoB 2 was applied independently by two reviewers. Primary outcome: pain intensity. Meta-analysis used RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: Eight studies included from 1,018 records. TENS significantly reduced pain (SMD = -1.85; 95% CI -2.90 to -0.79; p < 0.001), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). Subgroup analyses showed significant effects regardless of application site.  . CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis quantifies TENS analgesic effect for primary dysmenorrhea, suggesting pain reduction irrespective of electrode placement. However, very high heterogeneity, moderate-to-high risk of bias, wide parameter variability, small samples, and imprecise subgroup estimates limit certainty. TENS appears safe (no serious adverse events), but underreporting prevents firm conclusions. Standardized protocols and high-quality, low-bias trials are needed. Certainty is likely low per GRADE considerations. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42024540314.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the relief of primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. — 科研速览 Science Skim