科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ International journal of audiology2026-08-26

Lost in translation: understanding of jargon used in clinic-patient correspondence.

Amber Roughley, Helen Whiston, Gemma Perfect, Jenny Chan, Mark Sladen, Lucinda Pennington, Gabrielle H Saunders

一句话结论 · In one sentence

Understanding of jargon in NHS audiology department letters amongst older adults is poor, and therefore the use of these phrases should be avoided, or their meaning clearly explained within the letter.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
OBJECTIVE: To establish the level of older adults' understanding of medical jargon used in letters sent to patients from audiology departments after an audiology assessment appointment. DESIGN: Participants were asked to define commonly used audiology jargon terms via an online survey platform. The jargon terms were extracted from letters sent from UK National Health Service (NHS) audiology clinics following hearing assessment appointments. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 175 participants over the age of 50 years (mean age 70 years). RESULTS: Of 31 jargon terms assessed, 25% (n = 9) were incorrectly defined or not able to be defined by more than 75% of participants, while just 10% (n = 3) were correctly defined by more than 75% of participants. This was independent of age and whether an individual had had a prior audiology appointment and was largely independent of education level. CONCLUSION: Understanding of jargon in NHS audiology department letters amongst older adults is poor, and therefore the use of these phrases should be avoided, or their meaning clearly explained within the letter.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Lost in translation: understanding of jargon used in clinic-patient correspondence. — 科研速览 Science Skim