科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Education for primary care : an official publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors2026-08-21

AI patients, real practice: exploring the use of AI-simulated patients to support primary healthcare training for combat medical technicians.

Hugo Cohen, Ben Smith, Natasha Day, Chris Jacobs, Douglas Reid

一句话结论 · In one sentence

AI-simulated patients are feasible to implement and are associated with meaningful improvements in consultation confidence among CMTs. Despite technical constraints, AI-simulated patients represent a scalable, standardised adjunct to support clinical currency across the CMT workforce. Further research should evaluate objective competence outcomes and explore broader uses of this technology.

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
INTRODUCTION: Combat Medical Technicians (CMTs) are central to military primary care but have limited opportunity for clinical exposure. Simulated patients offer a controlled method to maintain clinical currency. Advances in conversational artificial intelligence (AI) enable realistic and interactive simulated consultations. We present our evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability and educational impact of AI-simulated patients for CMT training. METHODS: Five military primary care simulated patients were developed and hosted on the SimFlow.ai platform and delivered during a development course. Participants completed pre- and post-simulation surveys assessing confidence across 12 clinical domains alongside perceptions of realism, usability and educational value. Quantitative analysis used Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Spearman rank correlations. RESULTS: Twenty CMTs completed both simulations and surveys. Statistically significant improvements were observed in 10 of 12 clinical domains, including core consultation skills such as comprehensive history taking, identifying key symptoms, adapting questioning and formulating a management plan, and differential diagnoses (all p < 0.002). Evaluation of the simulations demonstrated positive perceptions of medical accuracy, patient narratives and overall educational value. Technical performance received mixed feedback, with response lags identified as the primary barrier. No associations were found between outcomes and CMT demographics which suggests equitable benefit across the cohort. CONCLUSION: AI-simulated patients are feasible to implement and are associated with meaningful improvements in consultation confidence among CMTs. Despite technical constraints, AI-simulated patients represent a scalable, standardised adjunct to support clinical currency across the CMT workforce. Further research should evaluate objective competence outcomes and explore broader uses of this technology.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

AI patients, real practice: exploring the use of AI-simulated patients to support primary healthcare training for combat medical technicians. — 科研速览 Science Skim