Aditi Malik, Daniel Encinas
Why do some rebel organisations collapse at the end of war while others endure and metamorphose? Based on a comparison of Peru’s Shining Path and Nepal’s Maoists, this article leverages 50 original interviews alongside documentary evidence to highlight the role of different leadership styles in shaping post-conflict survival. In Peru, the dogmatism of Guzmán made Shining Path unwilling to negotiate, culminating in its collapse. By contrast, key Nepali Maoists, notably the moderates, adopted a pragmatic approach with an openness to peace talks. These leaders learned from Shining Path’s disintegration, and chose to act differently, thereby securing post-conflict organisational survival.