科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of Health Communication2026-08-01· Misinformation

A Unifying Guide for Action: A Practical Synthesis of National Academies Documents on Mis- and Disinformation (2020–2025)

Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Josefina Núñez Sahr, Howard Koh, Vish K. Viswanath, Elena Savoia

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
The rapid spread of mis/disinformation has become a threat to public health. In response, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) produced nine publications on this topic between 2020-2025. This study qualitatively analyzes and synthesizes these publications to examine how approaches to misinformation are articulated across levels and sectors. The most recent, a 2025 Consensus Study Report, served as a reference framework; its 13 formal recommendations guided deductive coding of proposed actions across the remaining publications, with inductive refinement of emergent themes. As a result, seven themes emerged: 1) community engagement, 2) tools and techniques to counter misinformation, 3) communication, 4) social media and online platforms, 5) collaboration, 6) journalism, and 7) other priorities. Across these themes, approaches are distributed, but unevenly developed, across individual, community, institutional, and technological levels, involving a wide range of actors. Taken together, these publications call for practical, audience-specific communication strategies grounded in trust-building efforts, with genuine community involvement. Future work should evaluate the effectiveness of proposed approaches while considering the evolving regulatory, political, and social context in which misinformation persists.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

A Unifying Guide for Action: A Practical Synthesis of National Academies Documents on Mis- and Disinformation (2020–2025) — 科研速览 Science Skim