Sophie van der Steen, Morten Skovdal, Freedom Dzamatira, Rufurwokuda Maswera, Malebogo Tlhajoane, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson
While policy uptake often relies on persuasive narrative framing, some policy initiatives simply make practical sense. We observed this with Zimbabwe's universal HIV test-and-treat policy and examined the factors that may have contributed to this. We conducted nine interviews with healthcare workers and three focus group discussions with 20 people living with HIV and on treatment. We analysed transcripts thematically using thematic network analysis. We found that the treat-all policy made a great deal of sense to patients and providers of HIV treatment. First, participants considered the policy practical and doable, and perceived it as requiring only small changes to existing systems and practices. Second, participants had long wanted the introduction of a treat-all policy to expand access to treatment and reduce the disease burden. Universal test-and-treat was considered a seemingly natural next step in HIV healthcare policy in Zimbabwe. Third, the strongest incentive for implementing universal test-and-treat was the lived experience of early treatment's health benefits, which enabled patients to lead full lives and pursue broader life goals. Successful policy transitions occur when policies make sense - meaning they are anticipated, align seemlessly with existing health system practices, and advance both health and individual life goals.