科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Accountability in research2026-08-08

Distinguishing Contributor Listing from acknowledgments: Preserving the human dimension of scholarly recognition.

Yana Suchikova

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Holcombe et al. (2026) propose practical mechanisms for making specific non-author research contributions more visible through ORCID identifiers, CRediT information, manuscript submission systems, and JATS-XML metadata. We support this aim but argue that its implementation requires a clearer distinction between two questions: how substantive contributions should be formally credited, and how broadly authors may acknowledge the human relationships and circumstances underlying scholarly work. We propose two complementary categories: a structured Contributor Listing for machine-readable author and non-author contributions and narrative Acknowledgments for gratitude and contextual recognition. This distinction would advance visibility and accountability without allowing the standardization of contributor credit to become the standardization of gratitude.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Distinguishing Contributor Listing from acknowledgments: Preserving the human dimension of scholarly recognition. — 科研速览 Science Skim