Sally L Bullock, Ella Williams, Rylie Brosius, Christopher R Marsicano
SNAP resources may not be distributed based on student need. Addressing this potential misalignment requires federal eligibility reform, stronger state policies, and institutional commitment at under-resourced institutions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess SNAP resource prevalence at U.S. four-year institutions and examine whether institutional characteristics and student economic need predict availability.
PARTICIPANTS: A national sample of 481 U.S. four-year institutions of higher education.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional systematic website review (July 2023-July 2025), documenting six SNAP resource types and using Poisson regression to examine predictors.
RESULTS: Nearly 40% of institutions provide no SNAP resources. Passive resources were most common (external links: 57%; general information: 48%); resources requiring greater investment were rare (coordinators: 15%; on-campus SNAP/EBT acceptance: 7%; screening tools: 6%; partnerships: 5%). Institution size, public control, and region predict SNAP resources; Pell grant enrollment does not. State hunger-free campus policies are associated with coordinator availability only.
CONCLUSIONS: SNAP resources may not be distributed based on student need. Addressing this potential misalignment requires federal eligibility reform, stronger state policies, and institutional commitment at under-resourced institutions.