Agathi Pavlikanidi, Angelos Kontos, Lydia Gkonela-Kavardini, Konstantinos Karagkiozopoulos, Anna Christakou, Maria Kyriakidou
MT may have a role in managing selected biomechanical impairments when applied with clear clinical indications within a broader rehabilitation program. Training background, not years of experience, is the primary driver of clinical reasoning and risk perception. Findings emphasize the need for specialized pediatric education and longitudinal research.
AIMS: To describe Manual Therapy (MT) practices, clinical reasoning, and perceived effectiveness among Greek physiotherapists working with children with neurological disorders.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 61 physiotherapists practicing in Greece, using a 34-item questionnaire assessing practice patterns, effectiveness, and safety. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests.
RESULTS: MT was used by 55.7% of participants, primarily as an adjunct intervention. It was rated most effective for joint mobility and range of motion. Formal MT training correlated with higher perceived effectiveness for pain reduction (p = .013) and sensory processing (p = .004). Conversely, specialized pediatric neurological training was negatively associated with perceived effectiveness for range of motion (p = .020) and joint mobility (p = .025). Frequent MT use was significantly associated with lower perceived safety (p <.001), indicating that clinical exposure increases risk awareness. No significant associations existed between years of experience and MT implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: MT may have a role in managing selected biomechanical impairments when applied with clear clinical indications within a broader rehabilitation program. Training background, not years of experience, is the primary driver of clinical reasoning and risk perception. Findings emphasize the need for specialized pediatric education and longitudinal research.