Clinical educators' perspectives of allied health student placement supervision: A mixed methods study.

INTRODUCTION: This study explored clinical educators' perspectives on their supervision experiences, focusing on successes and challenges, including experiences working with allied health students who underperformed or failed practice placements. METHOD: This study used a convergent mixed-methods design. Universities in Australia and New Zealand (n = 19) that deliver allied health programs (n = 14 professions) were invited to participate. An online questionnaire administered to allied health clinical educators collected quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and content analysis was used to analyse free-text responses. Occupational Adaptation Theory was applied as an interpretative framework. RESULTS: Sixteen universities consented to participate. Data from 66 questionnaires representing clinical educators from 10 professions were compared and triangulated. Constructed themes described that positive placement experiences were shaped by clinical educators' embracing their supervisory roles, having strong professional connections and supportive workplaces. In contrast, negative placement experiences were associated with students lacking foundational skills, learning under pressure, or limited professional readiness. DISCUSSION: Clinical educators reported being equipped to recognise overt student supports but underestimated the impact that environment and educational relationships had on students' capacity to adapt or seek assistance during situations of underperformance. Applying Occupational Adaptation Theory to support data interpretation highlighted that, in addition to supervisory training, mastering their roles and having actionable strategies to support learners in difficulty, requires adequate resourcing and recognition to ensure CEs are equipped to manage every element of student learning.