Eero Kytö, Matti Karjalainen, Saara Markkanen, Tero Vahlberg, Lassi Raittinen, Rami Taulu, Jussi Hirvonen, Saana Isler, Jussi Laranne, Heikki Irjala, Elina Halme
Although routine PET imaging identified some asymptomatic recurrences amenable to curative treatment, it did not improve long-term survival, questioning its value in routine follow-up of asymptomatic HNSCC patients.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of head and neck cancer is increasing, creating a growing need for follow-up strategies. The benefit of routine PET imaging beyond six months after treatment in asymptomatic patients remains unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether routine PET/CT or PET/MRI imaging one year after treatment improves survival in asymptomatic patients with HNSCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective real-world cohort study, 590 asymptomatic HNSCC patients treated between 2010 and 2015 were included. All had achieved complete metabolic response on PET imaging 3-4 months after primary treatment. Patients underwent either routine PET imaging at one year (n=241) or no routine imaging (n=349). Primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival(OS) and disease-free survival(DFS).
RESULTS: Routine imaging detected recurrence in 14 patients (5.8%). Eight of these were eligible for curative treatment, with a 2-year OS of 38%. However, routine PET imaging was not associated with improved 5-year OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.05) or DFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68-1.43). No stage- or site-specific subgroup demonstrated a significant survival benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: Although routine PET imaging identified some asymptomatic recurrences amenable to curative treatment, it did not improve long-term survival, questioning its value in routine follow-up of asymptomatic HNSCC patients.