Adam Cuker, Thomas Stauch, Nichola Cooper, Hanny Al‐Samkari, Marc Michel, Waleed Ghanima, Patrick Urban, Justyna Fronczek, Matthew Foster, Marine Weill, Lei Zhang, Ming Hou, Thomas Zander, Azizan Sharif, Jing Sun, Uttam Kumar Nath, Roger E. G. Schutgens, Elena Rossi, Lien Deleu, Libor Červínek, Jae‐Ho Yoon, Hung Chang, Theera Ruchutrakool, Masaki Iino, Tatsunori Goto, Francesco Zaja
BACKGROUND: Current second-line treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) require long-term administration. Ianalumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting B cells, is being assessed as a short-course second-line therapy in ITP. METHODS: per liter in at least 75% of the measurements between weeks 19 and 25 without use of rescue therapy or new ITP therapy. Safety was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients underwent randomization: 50 to the 9-mg ianalumab group, 51 to the 3-mg ianalumab group, and 51 to the placebo group. The estimated probability of being free from treatment failure at 12 months was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39 to 67) in the 9-mg group, 51% (95% CI, 36 to 64) in the 3-mg group, and 30% (95% CI, 18 to 43) in the placebo group. The time to treatment failure was significantly longer with ianalumab plus eltrombopag than with placebo plus eltrombopag; the estimated hazard ratio for treatment failure (ianalumab vs. placebo) was 0.55 (P = 0.04) in the 9-mg group and 0.58 (P = 0.045) in the 3-mg group. The percentage of patients with a stable response at 6 months was significantly higher in the 9-mg group than in the placebo group (62% vs. 39%; P = 0.045). The overall frequency of adverse events during the treatment period was generally similar in the three groups. The frequency of serious adverse events was 16% in the 9-mg group, 6% in the 3-mg group, and 4% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Ianalumab plus eltrombopag led to a longer time to treatment failure than placebo plus eltrombopag. (Funded by Novartis; VAYHIT2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05653219.).