Shuhei Tokiwa, Keisuke Natsume, Akira Yoshida, Hajime Yonezawa, Kentaro Kawamura, Kazuki Nakanishi, Nayuta Higa, Ryosuke Hanaya, Megumi Shimodozono
Discharge FAC carries prognostic information not captured by contemporaneous global performance status and is a practical bedside marker at the transition to post-discharge care, rather than a stand-alone prediction tool.
PURPOSE: Walking ability is readily assessed at the bedside; however, whether it adds prognostic information beyond global performance status in glioblastoma (GBM) is unknown. We examined the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) at six peri-treatment time points and whether discharge FAC is associated with overall survival (OS) independently of contemporaneous performance status.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 185 adults with newly diagnosed GBM treated from 2011 to 2020. FAC was assessed preoperatively, on postoperative day 5, before chemoradiotherapy, at discharge, and 1 and 4 months after discharge. The primary analysis used a discharge landmark, with FAC grouped as 0-1, 2-4, and 5 and adjustment for age, sex, extent of resection, and discharge Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Incremental performance was assessed using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index.
RESULTS: Higher FAC was associated with longer OS at all six time points, with the strongest univariable association at discharge. In the discharge-landmark model (n = 162; 138 deaths), adjusted hazard ratios versus FAC 0-1 were 0.45 (95% CI, 0.27-0.73) for FAC 2-4 and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.17-0.63) for FAC 5. Adding FAC improved fit and discrimination (ΔAIC, - 8.4; ΔC-index, + 0.022; p = 0.002). Estimates were unchanged after additional adjustment for bevacizumab and post-discharge temozolomide.
CONCLUSION: Discharge FAC carries prognostic information not captured by contemporaneous global performance status and is a practical bedside marker at the transition to post-discharge care, rather than a stand-alone prediction tool.
REGISTRATION: This study was not prospectively registered.
PROTOCOL: No prospective study protocol was prepared.