Lukas Michaja Balsiger, Jolien Schol, Karlien Raymenants, Cedric Van de Bruaene, Joran Toth, Karen Routhiaux, Matthias Ceulemans, Julie Vanderstappen, Astrid Verbiest, Michael Jones, Ricard Farré, Tim Vanuytsel, Jan Tack
Acute alterations visualized using CLE have poor sensitivity and specificity for dietary responses in IBS patients. Moreover, altered mucosa was present in 100% of healthy volunteers and likely represents a non-specific mucosal reaction to food exposure rather than pathology, challenging the use of CLE in clinical practice to identify culprit foods. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05097872).
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In the duodenum of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), acute food-induced mucosal reactions have been visualized using confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE). In uncontrolled studies, a diet excluding trigger foods led to symptomatic improvement. Here, we aim to assess the association of food-induced alterations identified using CLE and the efficacy of a targeted diet in a controlled study.
METHODS: Double-blind, controlled, crossover study in patients with IBS. Following CLE, patients excluded up to two foods that did (= real diet) and up to two foods that did not (= sham diet) cause alterations in a randomized order. Diets were followed for four weeks each. Clinical response was defined as improving ≥50 points on the IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS). Healthy controls underwent the same CLE protocol as patients with IBS.
RESULTS: Altered mucosa was visualized in all patients either before (11%) or after food administration. Clinical response rates were not different between real and sham diet (42% vs 36%, OR = 1.33, p = 0.6). Symptoms improved both on the real and the sham diet (-30 vs -20; p = 0.7). Also, in 15 healthy volunteers, altered mucosa was visualized in 100% of the exams either at baseline (13%) or after food administration.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute alterations visualized using CLE have poor sensitivity and specificity for dietary responses in IBS patients. Moreover, altered mucosa was present in 100% of healthy volunteers and likely represents a non-specific mucosal reaction to food exposure rather than pathology, challenging the use of CLE in clinical practice to identify culprit foods. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05097872).