科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ npj Science of Plants2026-02-02· Legislation

Global status of genome editing versus transgenesis legislation in plants and the current EU situation

Agnès Ricroch, Walid Ben Rahal, Basile Genty, Raphaëlle Lherminier

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Precise breeding programs using new genome editing techniques have been developed to create plant varieties adapted to climate change. We studied the regulatory status of the 196 members of the United Nations (distinguishing the four UK countries) according to their legislation on transgenesis. We identified eight statuses for these techniques: ‘allowed for any use’ (24 countries, Argentina being the first in 2015), ‘allowed for import’ (1), ‘legislation under discussion’ (37), ‘not allowed except for food aid’ (0), ‘not allowed’ (3), ‘regulated as transgenics’ (7), ‘no legislation’ (114) and ‘no data available’ (10). We discussed the current situation in the European Union (EU) as many countries are awaiting its regulation. We also examined field trials carried out by six EU countries. We looked at authorised and commercialised gene-edited (GenEd) plants. Countries that have authorised transgenic (Tr) plants are 22.6% more likely to approve GenEd plants than those that have not.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Global status of genome editing versus transgenesis legislation in plants and the current EU situation — 科研速览 Science Skim