科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ npj Sustainable Agriculture2026-01-21· Sustainability

Reviewing the evidence on precision agriculture and environmental sustainability

Sarah-Louise Ruder, Hilary Olivia Faxon, Emma Catherine Orzel, Rachana Devkota, Kelly Bronson

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Precision agriculture (PA) is widely presented as a solution to the contemporary problem of feeding the world while conserving natural resources and limiting environmental harms. In this review paper, we summarize the field trial evidence demonstrating that PA use leads to environmental benefits. We systematically reviewed 444 English-language academic publications on PA and sustainability, we found 54 papers that present field-trial or modeling evidence, of which 45 demonstrated environmental benefits during field trials including: reduced fertilizer use; reduced herbicide or pesticide use; reduced water use or contamination (e.g., runoff); improved soil quality; or reduced GHG emissions or fuel consumption. The most evidence exists for variable rate technologies in grain farming, which showed decreased fertilizer use compared to control or universal applications. Our analysis also reveals that some academics make claims about PA and sustainability without presenting adequate evidence. More research is needed which defines sustainability models and metrics, then empirically tests PA along these metrics across a range of agricultural systems.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Reviewing the evidence on precision agriculture and environmental sustainability — 科研速览 Science Skim