科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ npj Digital Medicine2026-02-03· Perioperative

Digital health interventions for perioperative patient-reported outcomes: a network meta-analysis

Ziyue Luo, Ruihao Zhou, Jingwen Wei, Kailei Nong, Xiran Peng, Lu Chen, Peiyi Li, Sisi Deng, Mengchan Ou, Ling Ye, Yaqiang Wang, Guo Chen, Xuechao Hao, Sheyu Li, Tao Zhu

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Digital health interventions (DHIs), delivered via digital platforms such as internet-based programs, mobile applications or short messages, may improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), but comparative effectiveness is unclear. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, identified in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science to March 1, 2025. Standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs) with minimal important differences (MIDs), and 95% CIs were estimated. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE. Fifty-six trials (6,154 patients) were included. Extended reality (XR) most effectively reduced perioperative anxiety (SMD 0.60; 95% CI 0.37-0.84; MD 8.05; MID 6.71; moderate-certainty). For postoperative pain, mobile applications (SMD 0.64; 95% CI 0.32-0.95; MD 1.36; MID 1.0; moderate-certainty) and XR (SMD 0.51; 95% CI 0.26-0.76; MD 1.09; MID 1.0; moderate-certainty) were probably effective. For quality of life, 2D video yielded the greatest gain (SMD 0.99; 95% CI 0.11-1.88; MD 0.11; MID 0.05; high-certainty). XR also improved satisfaction (SMD 1.27; 95% CI 0.63-1.91; MD 1.91; MID 0.75; moderate-certainty). These findings suggest that DHIs may improve perioperative PROs.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Digital health interventions for perioperative patient-reported outcomes: a network meta-analysis — 科研速览 Science Skim