Shaan Khurshid, Sam Friedman, Mostafa A. Al‐Alusi, Shinwan Kany, Thomas Sommers, Christopher D. Anderson, Jennifer E. Ho, David D. McManus, Leila H. Borowsky, Jeffrey M. Ashburner, Steven A. Lubitz, Steven J. Atlas, Mahnaz Maddah, Daniel E. Singer, Patrick T. Ellinor
Whether artificial intelligence (AI) analysis of single-lead ECG (1 L ECG) can predict incident AF is unknown. In the VITAL-AF trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03515057, registered 2/24/2021) of primary care patients aged ≥65 years undergoing handheld 1 L ECG screening, we tested three AI approaches to incident AF prediction, and compared the best model to the CHARGE-AF risk score. In a test set of 4,221 individuals, a published AI model trained using single standard ECG leads ("1 L ECG-AI") provided similar 2-year AF discrimination to models trained with VITAL-AF data. In the full VITAL-AF sample of 15,694 individuals without prevalent AF (2-year incident AF 3.1%), 1 L ECG-AI with age/sex (1 L ECG-AI AS) had comparable discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] 0.695[0.637-0.742]; average precision [AP] 0.060[0.050-0.078]) to CHARGE-AF (AUROC 0.679[0.623-0.730]; AP 0.062[0.052-0.080], AUROC p = 0.46, AP p = 0.92). Net reclassification improvement was favorable versus age ≥65 years (0.27[0.22-0.32]). 1 L ECG-AI may increase efficiency and reach of AF screening.