科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ npj Digital Medicine2025-11-17· Transparency (behavior)

Evaluating transparency in AI/ML model characteristics for FDA-reviewed medical devices

Viraj Mehta, Abhinav Komanduri, Rishabh Singh Bhadouriya, Vilina Mehta, Michael D. Johnson, Priyanka Shrestha, Margaret C. Nikolov, Bhav Jain, Nigam H. Shah, Kevin A. Schulman

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into medical devices has underscored the need for transparency in regulatory reporting. In 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) principles, but adherence in FDA-reviewed devices remains uncertain. We reviewed 1,012 summaries of safety and effectiveness (SSEDs) for AI/ML-enabled devices approved or cleared by the FDA between 1970 and December 2024. Transparency in model development and performance was assessed using a novel AI Characteristics Transparency Reporting (ACTR) score across 17 categories. The average ACTR score was 3.3 out of 17, with modest improvement by 0.88 points (95% CI, 0.54-1.23) after the 2021 guidelines. Nearly half of devices did not report a clinical study and over half did not report any performance metric. These findings highlight transparency gaps and emphasize the need for enforceable standards to ensure trust in AI/ML medical technologies.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Evaluating transparency in AI/ML model characteristics for FDA-reviewed medical devices — 科研速览 Science Skim