科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ npj Digital Medicine2025-10-02· Engineering ethics

Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis

Xinwei Chen, Yahan Yang, Dongyuan Yun, Ruixin Wang, Yuanfan Lin, Mingjie Luo, Weixing Zhang, Patrick Yu‐Wai‐Man, Matthew J. Burton, Lingyi Liang, Haotian Lin

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Ophthalmology, an early adopter of medical artificial intelligence (AI), has made significant advancements, but ethical discussions limited. This bibliometric analysis reviewed 498 publications from Web of Science and Scopus (2000-2023) to explore the evolution, status, thematic trends, data modalities and their ethical focus, and solutions in ophthalmic AI ethics. Ophthalmology ranks second in medical AI ethics, with major contributors from the United States (US), China, the United Kingdom (UK), Singapore and India. Ethical concerns focus on privacy, fairness, and transparency. Ethical priorities differ by modality with fundus imaging (59.4%) and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) (30.9%) as the most common. Most studies (78.3%) address ethics in diagnostic algorithm development, while only 11.5% directly target ethical concerns, though this focus is increasing. This study highlights the need for AI technologies and guidelines to address ethical challenges in ophthalmology, offering a future direction for research and innovation in medical AI governance.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Current status and solutions for AI ethics in ophthalmology: a bibliometric analysis — 科研速览 Science Skim