Xianwen Wang, Zhihong Zuo, Qihang Huang, Chunhui Li, Jialin Jin, Dongkai Li, Xuelian Liao, Zhanwen Wang, Jinwei Dai, Lina Zhang, Zhaoxin Qian
Older adults with sepsis have high mortality, but whether circulating immune-inflammatory biomarkers improve prediction beyond routine clinical information across hospitals is uncertain. We analysed 816 patients aged ≥ 60 years from a prospectively assembled multicentre cohort at four tertiary hospitals; 225 (27.6%) died in hospital. Five prespecified models were evaluated using leave-one-hospital-out internal–external validation. Routine-clinical extreme gradient boosting achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.688, an area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.453, and a Brier score of 0.186. Adding 19 immune-inflammatory biomarkers yielded an AUROC of 0.684, an AUPRC of 0.468, and a Brier score of 0.184. Compared with the routine-clinical model, differences were small and imprecise (ΔAUROC, − 0.003; ΔAUPRC, 0.015; Brier-score improvement, 0.002), and decision-curve benefit was inconsistent. The immune-enhanced model was poorly calibrated (slope, 0.751; intercept, − 0.189). Findings were similar in patients aged ≥ 65 years, but the incremental signal was not maintained after excluding SCHX, the smallest and highest-mortality centre. These data do not support clinical use of the full biomarker panel for mortality prediction.