Claire Huchthausen, Menglin Shi, Gabriel Garcez Barros Sousa, James M. Larner, Einsley Janowski, Jonathan Colen, K. Wijesooriya
Background: Conventional methods for detecting lung cancer early are often qualitative and subject to interpretation. Radiomics provides quantitative characteristics of pulmonary nodules (PNs) in medical images, but variability in medical image acquisition is an obstacle to consistent clinical application of these quantitative features. Correcting radiomic features' dependency on acquisition parameters is problematic when combining data from benign and malignant PNs, as is necessary when the goal is to diagnose lung cancer, because acquisition effects may differ between them due to their biological differences. Purpose: We evaluated whether we must account for biological differences between benign and malignant PNs when correcting the dependency of radiomic features on acquisition parameters, and we compared methods of doing this using ComBat harmonization. Methods: ≤ 0.05) Kruskal-Wallis test determined whether harmonization removed a feature's dependency on an acquisition parameter. A LASSO-SVM pipeline was trained using acquisition-independent radiomic features to predict whether PNs were malignant or benign. To evaluate the predictive information made available by each harmonization method, the trained harmonization estimators and predictive model were applied to a corresponding unseen test set. Harmonization and predictive performance metrics were assessed over 10 trials of 5-fold cross validation. Results: ≤ 0.05). There was not a conclusive difference in ROC-AUC between models trained on data harmonized separately and models trained on data harmonized with a covariate. Conclusions: Radiomic features of benign and malignant PNs require different corrective transformations to recover acquisition-independent distributions. This can be done using separate harmonization or harmonization with a covariate. Separate harmonization enabled the greatest number of predictive features to be used in a machine learning model to retrospectively detect lung cancer. Features harmonized separately and features harmonized with a covariate enabled predictive models to achieve similar performance on lung cancer screening scans.