科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Nature Communications2026-06-17· Macromolecule

Pulsed-electron illumination does not reduce beam damage for imaging biological macromolecules

Vishal Kumar, Julika Radecke, C. V., Inayathulla Mohammed, Ricardo Guerrero-Ferreira, Daniel Harder, Dimitrios Fotiadis, Henning Stahlberg

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
Abstract Radiation damage remains a fundamental limitation in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), constraining the total electron dose that can be used and thus limiting high-resolution imaging of biological specimens. Recent studies have proposed that temporally structured or pulsed electron beams could reduce radiation damage by allowing time for energy dissipation between individual electron interactions. To evaluate this hypothesis, we present a systematic investigation using a radiofrequency (RF) driven 300 kV Titan Krios microscope equipped with a cold field emission gun (c-FEG) to generate pulsed electron beams for specimens under cryogenic conditions. We compare radiation damage in three representative samples: paraffin 2D crystals, bacteriorhodopsin (purple membrane) 2D crystals, and plunge-frozen tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) in vitreous ice, under both pulsed and conventional ( = random) illumination, while keeping all other imaging conditions constant. Radiation damage is quantified by tracking the decay of computed diffraction intensities to determine the critical dose ( N e ). We observe no statistically significant difference in critical dose between pulsed and random illumination across all 3 samples. Our findings provide a critical reference point for future development and evaluation of temporally modulated electron sources in cryo-EM instrumentation.
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Pulsed-electron illumination does not reduce beam damage for imaging biological macromolecules — 科研速览 Science Skim