科研速览 · Science Skim继续刷下去 · Keep skimming →
◆ Journal of consulting and clinical psychology2026-07-01

Mental health treatments under scrutiny: Benefits, harms, and the cost of inaction.

Wendy K Silverman, Samuel D Spencer, Dean McKay

原始摘要(英文原文)· Original abstract
In this viewpoint article, The authors shine a spotlight on the inaction and an even brighter light on constructive recommendations for those conducting research on psychological treatments and disseminating its findings. The authors view these actions as necessary for disrupting the downward spiral of mistrust in science. Otherwise, advances in clinical psychological science and public health are in jeopardy. They propose two areas of action: (1) emphasize mechanisms of not only benefit but also potential harm in our conceptual and empirical analyses of mental health treatments-especially psychosocial interventions, and (2) balance dissemination efforts with regard to both benefits and harm. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
读原文 · Read the paper ↗

AI 追问PRO

登录后使用 AI 追问

讨论区

登录后参与讨论

相关论文 · Related

Mental health treatments under scrutiny: Benefits, harms, and the cost of inaction. — 科研速览 Science Skim