Anamika Shrimali
This Cultural Case Study examines how self-harm becomes meaningful within particular South Asian moral worlds, drawing on intergenerational family oral histories and autoethnographic reflection spanning Kashmir, Andhra Pradesh, Tehran, and the United States diaspora. Read alongside South Asian ethnographic and clinical scholarship, these narratives show that bodily self-injury can function as a form of situated agency and relational communication when verbal self-assertion is constrained. Building on prior work that interprets suicide and self-harm as gendered forms of communication in South Asia, I focus on the social variability of response: when self-harm compels witnessing and moral recognition, and when it instead meets habituation, ridicule, exhaustion, or strategic inattention. I argue that treating self-harm solely as psychopathology risks misreading its moral and interpersonal stakes and can undermine clinical assessment. A culturally attuned approach requires mapping the moral audiences, relational constraints, and idioms of personhood that structure how suffering becomes legible.