Jeremy C. Mullins, Matthew J. Evans, Joseph M. Parr, Dat T. Nguyen, Alasdair I. McKay, Thayalan Rajeshkumar, Ross O. Piltz, Alison J. Edwards, Laurent Maron, Cameron Jones
Three geometrically constrained, Lewis acidic magnesium diamides [Mg( R NON Ar )] ( R NON Ar = 4,5-bis(ArN)-2,7-dialkyl-9,9-dimethyl-xanthene; R = Et, Ar = 2,4,6-tricyclohexylphenyl (TCHP) 1; R = t Bu, Ar = TCHP 2; R = Et, Ar = 2,6-di(3-pentyl)phenyl (Dipep) 3 ) have been synthesized. X-ray crystal structures of 1 and 2 reveal them to be dimeric, with Mg centers intermolecularly coordinated by a cyclohexyl-CH 2 fragment from an opposing monomer unit. Treating 1 with n -pentane, n -hexane, or tetramethylsilane (TMS) gave the first examples of group 2 metal-alkane/TMS complexes, [Mg( Et NON TCHP )(κ 2 - H,H- pentane)] 4, [Mg( Et NON TCHP )(κ 2 - H,H- hexane)] 5 and [Mg( Et NON TCHP )(κ 3 - H,H,H- TMS)] 6 . While the coordinated alkane in 4 and 5 is displaced in cycloalkane solutions, compound 6 was spectroscopically observed to remain intact at low temperatures. Neutron and/or X-ray crystal structures of 4 – 6 confirm their formulations in the solid state. DFT analyses of 4 – 6 reveal the bonding between the alkane/TMS and Mg( Et NON TCHP ) fragment to be weak (Δ G ° 298 K = −2.9 to −5.6 kcal mol –1 ) but comparable to related values for transition metal σ-alkane complexes. ETS-NOCV and NBO analyses of the bonding in 4 - 6 indicate that electrostatic interactions between the alkane/TMS and Mg( Et NON TCHP ) fragments dominate (ca. 65%), but dispersion (ca. 20%) and orbital (ca. 15%) interactions are significant. Dispersion forces predominantly result from interaction of the alkane/TMS unit with the TCHP flanked lipophilic coordination pocket of Mg( Et NON TCHP ). Approximately, 40–60% of the orbital interactions between the alkane/TMS and Mg( Et NON TCHP ) units in 4 – 6 result from charge flow from the alkane/TMS CH 2 or CH 3 fragment to the magnesium center. This is supported by NCI and QTAIM analyses of the compounds.