Tomoyuki Takeyama, Reo Masui, Daisuke Shibata, Koji Mitamura, Fumito Tani, Takahide Yamaguchi, Tatsuo Yajima, YUICHI SHIMAZAKI, Takehiro Ohta, Nobutsugu Hamamoto
Debate over the electronic structure of Cu III complexes has intensified in recent years, focusing primarily on whether the [Cu(CF 3 ) 4 ] − moiety should be described as a classical Werner-type 3d 8 Cu III complex or as a 3d 10 Cu I inverted ligand field framework. The copper periodate complex [Cu(HIO 6 ) 2 ] 5–, discovered in 1937, has long been regarded as a 3d 8 Cu III species and sometimes used as a reference 3d 8 Cu III complex in oxidation state assignments for Cu-containing metalloenzymes. Nevertheless, its detailed electronic structure remains unexplored. Herein, we revisit the oxidation state of [Cu(HIO 6 ) 2 ] 5– by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations. The obtained results show that the oxidation state of the Cu center in [Cu(HIO 6 ) 2 ] 5– lies at the boundary between the classical Werner-type and inverted ligand field regimes. This study thus demonstrates that categorizing the oxidation state of Cu III complexes as either 3d 8 or 3d 10 configurations is often inadequate; instead, the existence of electronic states at the boundary between these two limiting cases should be recognized.